Are You a Victim of Liberal Indoctrination?

Picture from images.duckduckgo.com

                                

Are You a Victim of the Liberal Indoctrination Machine?

How do you take a young mind and mold it to think like a liberal? First you take a teacher in an elementary school and tell a child that corporations are bad because the people in corporations put money and greed over trees, life and environment. Not explaining that trees are needed to build anything out of wood including their own homes and fences. Then you are shown movies like Dr Seuss’s The Lorax which makes all manufacturing is evil. Push the documentaries like An Inconvenient Truth or The World of Stuff to the point of no other options to believe. If that narrative is continually pushed through out educational life, one would believe nothing else but what they where indoctrinated with.

Step two: Utilize text books only written and approved by people like the unrepentant domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers; whom bombed Police, bank and Pentagon Headquarters. It was at Bill Ayers house that launched Barry Soetoro’s political carrier (Ben Smith, 2008). Barry is also known as President Obama today.

Step three: Get college professors that have the same mind set and oppose any other teachings that may differ from what they were taught.

Now you have a person who can only align with one mind set of thinking and will vote for only one political party and to change that way of thinking would be admitting that their entire belief and schooling was misguided or in vain to say the least. It takes a strong person to open up to that degree. Those people are not easy to find. I consider myself one of the lucky ones.

Info for Liberal Indoctrination

Conspiracy Theory is the term that was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination!

“The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”
Today, the CIA-designed propaganda seems to be wearing off “… those who do not believe government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one.”

KB/HSN

Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror. Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications. Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008.

http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2013/07/cia-invention-of-the-phrase-conspiracy-theory-to-block-questions-on-jfks-assassination-is-one-of-the-most-successful-propaganda-initiatives-of-all-time-2453052.html

Robert Zajonc’s (1968) mere exposure research is so simple that we might debate whether it is a model, just as the debate continues whether Pluto should be reinstated as a planet. The principle behind it is a straightforward idea: Repeated exposure to a stimulus results in more favorable evaluation of that stimulus. In other words, the more we are exposed to something, the more we are likely to be favorable toward it. (Larson, 2013)-Chapter 4 In same cases it is lies. Lie to the people long enough and defame any opposition to it and that lie will be believed.

And Barack Obama was seen as someone who could save the world from a global depression. And maybe he did—we were on the edge of one when he followed through on George W. Bush’s TARP program of financial bailouts for various companies like the auto industry and the banking and financial communities as a whole.

This whole Paragraph is to persuade a student how evil the GOP was/is. “Presence of a Conspiracy Another cultural premise is the belief that when we face enormous, almost overwhelming problems, the only plausible explanation is that a powerful and conspiratorial group must be behind them. This pattern is called the paranoid style and is defined as using conspiracies as explanations for otherwise unanswerable dilemmas (Hofstadter, 1963). Probably the best examples are the various conspiracy theories concerning the assassination of John F. Kennedy, which are said to have been hatched in a variety of possible places depending on who is making the argument (e.g., the mob or the CIA). Many other conspiracy arguments have recurred throughout our recent history, such as those about the Masons and Knights Templar, conspiracies that lent credence to the recent novel and film, The Da Vinci Code, and other papal conspiracy theories. Most recently, the conspiracy argument was used to explain the 9/11 bombing and the Jihadist terrorism of our times. Some people believe that Muslim groups are presently conspiring to overthrow governments in the Middle East and build nuclear weapons. Some feel that the Iranian government is already in the hands of international conspirators including radical fundamentalist Muslim leaders and Russian co-conspirators. A conspiracy theory regarding terrorism apparently prompted the Bush administration to illegally wiretap phone calls to American citizens without obtaining warrants, even when such warrants are granted as a matter of course. This in turn led to a conspiracy theory about the administration’s disregard of constitutional rights.” (Larson, 2013)- (See how he is trying to make the words “Conspiracy Theory” into a negative. This is how the Liberals work. They put a negative mind set or a negative connotation on something that could hurt their agenda. Like “The Truth!”) Bush did sign in the Patriot Act- This was legislation that violates the civil rights of all American. What Larson doesn’t tell you is that Obama, extended that same legislation when it was time to do for it to expire. The term Conspiracy Theory was created by the CIA to place doubtful concern on those who had questions concerning the Assassination of Kennedy. This way the public would disregard those pesky individuals that ask too many questions and pass them on as kooks. Is it a conspiracy if it is true?

In the paragraph The coming of a Messiah “And Barack Obama was seen as someone who could save the world from a global depression. And maybe he did—we were on the edge of one when he followed through on George W. Bush’s TARP program of financial bailouts for various companies like the auto industry and the banking and financial communities as a whole.” (Larson, 2013) – Here, Larson referred to Obama as a world savior following Bush’s Tarp Program. –Talk about trying color a rose a different color. All Obama did was make the elitist more elite and the rest of us took a financial hit. I don’t see the mentioning of the 16 Trillion dollar debt we occurred and how our grandchildren’s futures will suffer for. It would have been better to allow the crisis to happen and then deal with it. All Obama did was kick the same can down the road. We are still going to financially collapse. That is a mathematical certainty.

Here is a small part of a paragraph written by Larson, the subject was Rotten at the Top, examples. “We saw it in Watergate during the 1970s with the scandal reaching to the highest levels of government, in Bill Clinton’s sex scandals in the 1990s, the fiscal scandals in corporate America, and the financial scandals associated with military cost overruns and over-charging in Iraq in the new millennium. And you can bet that we will soon be uncovering the misdeeds of those in charge in the first decade of the new millennium, as has already happened in Illinois, where the governor apparently tried to sell the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Barack Obama when he became president. The enormous amounts of money spent “off budget” on the two longest wars in U.S. history would have been too tempting for the “greedy guts” in government during those years. Put that together with the outlandish freedom given to banks and other financial institutions during those years and you have to know that the “thieves” were in charge. We often hear that big business has exploited the common man, and we still see Wall Street scandals based on insider trading by “stock market jackals” and “corporate barracudas.” All of these are examples of rot at the top. The lesson of this myth is simple: Power corrupts; privilege perverts.” Notice how Obama is not shown in a bad light anywhere in here. Neither is Hillary Clinton. The Tarp bailouts that Obama pushed through to save the so called economy. Well, NAFTA is the main ingredient with the legislation signed in my Bill Clinton, forcing banks to loan money to people who could not afford it. The “stock market jackals” as Larson puts it was the same group of jackals the Obama bailed out by giving money too. Instead he mentions 7 ½ minutes of tapes being erased during the Nixon administration.

Lets look at this: IMAGE AS A CULTURAL PREMISE

Sometimes persuaders are successful because of their image or charisma. Somehow they seem to have a special presence, and they command the public’s attention. We believe them because their presentations are convincing and dynamic, or because they have a reputation for being truthful or knowledgeable. Barack Obama seemed to have this kind of charisma during the 2008 primary campaigns but lost some of it when Democrats lost the House in 2010.- Larson blames the lost of charisma on the Democrats losing the house. Even here he can’t come to blaming the President’s bad decisions on the President. Why? – So far I come to the conclusion that Larson see’s Obama as his messiah.

Here again, Larsen trying to push he agenda by always comparing negative aspects to Republican leaders and ignoring the Democrat leaders. He does this push his Liberal agenda and teach a lesson as the same time. “The speaker was introduced to some of the groups as the surgeon general while to others the speaker was introduced as a college senior. The listeners found the “expert” much more credible than the non-expert. This same kind of respect and credibility applies to a person’s media literacy as seen in Box 9.2. When President Bush said that a person could look for maps on “The Google” during a 2007 CNBC news interview, he betrayed his lack of media literacy by putting the word “the” in front of “Google” and thus embarrassed himself and members of his staff and probably lost some credibility as well.” Pg 274. Not one mention of the numerous things said by Obama, Like referring to American as having 57 states, or Obama calls Navy Corpsman (pr. core-man) “corpse-man”, or On Memorial Day Obama said, “I see many of the fallen heroes in the audience here today as we celebrate Memorial Day”. …. This book should be banned from college shelves. This indoctrination is so obvious, it hurts.

This chart Fig.8.3 in Chapter 8 … 

This chart is very deceiving but the author does not care. He purposely left out Obama’s part in this. Larson uses it so young people unaware of how economics works in the country will be deceived. This chart is to make a young mind believe that compared to the GOP, it is the Democrats that look good, yet once again. The details missing are how Regan got us out of a recession that Carter put us in. It takes years for any economic development. I argue that Clinton was on the receiving end of the benefits and successes of Regan. When Clinton took office the economy was a good recovery from Regan’s efforts and in 1996 when Clinton signed in NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) that is our first step to our economic downfall. We were warned against such a policy by Ross Perot. People thought Ross was crazy, but it turns out that he was dead on. Then during Clinton’s term in office; Clinton signed in a policy that forced banks to give loans to people who would not normally be able to get loan. This forced a lot of bad decisions and loans to be given to people who could not pay them back. In 2008, the housing bubble that was created bursts from this practice. Bush got all of the blame for that; when in fact, Clinton is the one to blame. To make matters worse, in 2003, Bush actually tried to get that reversed and failed. Bush tried to get rid of the bad practices and warned of its affects. So now here we are today, 19 Trillion in debt and barely being able to make the interest payments on our loans thanks to Obama wanting the kick the can down the road. People today still think we are on the upswing because that is what they are being told via the mass media and the Liberals blinders of deception. You won’t see the 19 trillion dollar debt on that chart, but you will hear how it was all Bush’s fault; Even after 8 years of Obama promising to fix the economy. Total denial on the liberal indoctrination machines part.

So based on all that I have proven and all that I have shown you, do you believe that you are being indoctrinated. This is just one text book, if you look at all of the text books from your past, you will find the same thing. Do you believe that you have been on the indoctrination path since childhood through the schools and media? Are you the victim of Liberal Indoctrination? I was until I opened my eyes and searched out the truth for myself. Ask yourself that question…..”Am I the victim of Indoctrination?” Then once you allow your eyes to open, you can then search your own path and tell the machine to kiss your open eyed butt. You will not take it anymore.”

Good Luck and Blessings,

Matthew McKeon
Electrical Distribution Designer
Communication Major

References

Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility

THIRTEENTH EDITION 2007

CHARLES U. LARSON

Northern Illinois University, Emeritus

 The Politico, LLC

http://www.politico.com/story/2008/02/obama-once-visited-60s-radicals-008630

volkalize, 2015

http://www.volkalize.com/topic/terrorists-writing-textbooks-bill-ayers-in-the-classroom/

Started by Crystal @crystalclanton

www.Turningpointuse.net

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVP4--PJKa0

 DuckDuckGo.com

images.duckduckgo.com