 |
| Picture from images.duckduckgo.com |
Are You a Victim of the Liberal Indoctrination Machine?
How do you take a young mind and
mold it to think like a liberal? First you take a teacher in an elementary
school and tell a child that corporations are bad because the people in corporations
put money and greed over trees, life and environment. Not explaining that trees
are needed to build anything out of wood including their own homes and fences.
Then you are shown movies like Dr Seuss’s The Lorax which makes all
manufacturing is evil. Push the documentaries like An Inconvenient Truth or The
World of Stuff to the point of no other options to believe. If that narrative
is continually pushed through out educational life, one would believe nothing
else but what they where indoctrinated with.
Step two: Utilize text books only
written and approved by people like the unrepentant domestic terrorist, Bill
Ayers; whom bombed Police, bank and
Pentagon Headquarters. It was at Bill Ayers house that launched Barry Soetoro’s
political carrier (Ben Smith, 2008). Barry is also known as President Obama today.
Step three: Get college professors
that have the same mind set and oppose any other teachings that may differ from
what they were taught.
Now you have a person who can only
align with one mind set of thinking and will vote for only one political party
and to change that way of thinking would be admitting that their entire belief
and schooling was misguided or in vain to say the least. It takes a strong
person to open up to that degree. Those people are not easy to find. I consider
myself one of the lucky ones.
Info for Liberal Indoctrination
Conspiracy Theory is the term that
was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame
people questioning the JFK assassination!
“The
CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy
belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with
being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”
Today, the CIA-designed propaganda seems to be wearing off “… those who
do not believe government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK
assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one.”
KB/HSN
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is
one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror. Dr. Barrett has
appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has
inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian
Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications. Dr.
Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and
Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008.
Robert Zajonc’s (1968) mere
exposure research is so simple that we might debate whether it is a model, just
as the debate continues whether Pluto should be reinstated as a planet. The
principle behind it is a straightforward idea: Repeated exposure to a stimulus
results in more favorable evaluation of that stimulus. In other words, the more
we are exposed to something, the more we are likely to be favorable toward it.
(Larson, 2013)-Chapter 4 In same cases it is lies. Lie to the people long
enough and defame any opposition to it and that lie will be believed.
And Barack Obama was seen as
someone who could save the world from a global depression. And maybe he did—we
were on the edge of one when he followed through on George W. Bush’s TARP
program of financial bailouts for various companies like the auto industry and
the banking and financial communities as a whole.
This whole Paragraph is to persuade
a student how evil the GOP was/is. “Presence of a Conspiracy Another cultural
premise is the belief that when we face enormous, almost overwhelming problems,
the only plausible explanation is that a powerful and conspiratorial group must
be behind them. This pattern is called the paranoid style and is defined as
using conspiracies as explanations for otherwise unanswerable dilemmas
(Hofstadter, 1963). Probably the best examples are the various conspiracy
theories concerning the assassination of John F. Kennedy, which are said to have
been hatched in a variety of possible places depending on who is making the
argument (e.g., the mob or the CIA). Many other conspiracy arguments have
recurred throughout our recent history, such as those about the Masons and
Knights Templar, conspiracies that lent credence to the recent novel and film,
The Da Vinci Code, and other papal conspiracy theories. Most recently, the
conspiracy argument was used to explain the 9/11 bombing and the Jihadist
terrorism of our times. Some people believe that Muslim groups are presently
conspiring to overthrow governments in the Middle East and build nuclear
weapons. Some feel that the Iranian government is already in the hands of
international conspirators including radical fundamentalist Muslim leaders and
Russian co-conspirators. A conspiracy theory regarding terrorism apparently
prompted the Bush administration to illegally wiretap phone calls to American
citizens without obtaining warrants, even when such warrants are granted as a
matter of course. This in turn led to a conspiracy theory about the
administration’s disregard of constitutional rights.” (Larson, 2013)- (See how
he is trying to make the words “Conspiracy Theory” into a negative. This is how
the Liberals work. They put a negative mind set or a negative connotation on
something that could hurt their agenda. Like “The Truth!”) Bush did sign in the
Patriot Act- This was legislation that violates the civil rights of all
American. What Larson doesn’t tell you is that Obama, extended that same
legislation when it was time to do for it to expire. The term Conspiracy Theory
was created by the CIA to place doubtful concern on those who had questions
concerning the Assassination of Kennedy. This way the public would disregard
those pesky individuals that ask too many questions and pass them on as kooks. Is
it a conspiracy if it is true?
In the paragraph The coming of a
Messiah “And Barack Obama was seen as someone who could save the world from a
global depression. And maybe he did—we were on the edge of one when he followed
through on George W. Bush’s TARP program of financial bailouts for various
companies like the auto industry and the banking and financial communities as a
whole.” (Larson, 2013) – Here, Larson referred to Obama as a world savior
following Bush’s Tarp Program. –Talk about trying color a rose a different
color. All Obama did was make the elitist more elite and the rest of us took a
financial hit. I don’t see the mentioning of the 16 Trillion dollar debt we
occurred and how our grandchildren’s futures will suffer for. It would have
been better to allow the crisis to happen and then deal with it. All Obama did
was kick the same can down the road. We are still going to financially
collapse. That is a mathematical certainty.
Here is a small part of a paragraph
written by Larson, the subject was Rotten at the Top, examples. “We saw it in
Watergate during the 1970s with the scandal reaching to the highest levels of
government, in Bill Clinton’s sex scandals in the 1990s, the fiscal scandals in
corporate America, and the financial scandals associated with military cost
overruns and over-charging in Iraq in the new millennium. And you can bet that
we will soon be uncovering the misdeeds of those in charge in the first decade
of the new millennium, as has already happened in Illinois, where the governor
apparently tried to sell the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Barack Obama when he
became president. The enormous amounts of money spent “off budget” on the two
longest wars in U.S. history would have been too tempting for the “greedy guts”
in government during those years. Put that together with the outlandish freedom
given to banks and other financial institutions during those years and you have
to know that the “thieves” were in charge. We often hear that big business has
exploited the common man, and we still see Wall Street scandals based on
insider trading by “stock market jackals” and “corporate barracudas.” All of
these are examples of rot at the top. The lesson of this myth is simple: Power
corrupts; privilege perverts.” Notice how Obama is not shown in a bad light
anywhere in here. Neither is Hillary Clinton. The Tarp bailouts that Obama
pushed through to save the so called economy. Well, NAFTA is the main
ingredient with the legislation signed in my Bill Clinton, forcing banks to
loan money to people who could not afford it. The “stock market jackals” as
Larson puts it was the same group of jackals the Obama bailed out by giving
money too. Instead he mentions 7 ½ minutes of tapes being erased during the
Nixon administration.
Lets look at this: IMAGE AS A
CULTURAL PREMISE
Sometimes persuaders are successful
because of their image or charisma. Somehow they seem to have a special
presence, and they command the public’s attention. We believe them because
their presentations are convincing and dynamic, or because they have a
reputation for being truthful or knowledgeable. Barack Obama seemed to have
this kind of charisma during the 2008 primary campaigns but lost some of it
when Democrats lost the House in 2010.- Larson blames the lost of charisma on
the Democrats losing the house. Even here he can’t come to blaming the
President’s bad decisions on the President. Why? – So far I come to the
conclusion that Larson see’s Obama as his messiah.
Here again, Larsen trying to push
he agenda by always comparing negative aspects to Republican leaders and
ignoring the Democrat leaders. He does this push his Liberal agenda and teach a
lesson as the same time. “The speaker was introduced to some of the groups as
the surgeon general while to others the speaker was introduced as a college
senior. The listeners found the “expert” much more credible than the non-expert.
This same kind of respect and credibility applies to a person’s media literacy
as seen in Box 9.2. When President Bush said that a person could look for maps
on “The Google” during a 2007 CNBC news interview, he betrayed his lack of
media literacy by putting the word “the” in front of “Google” and thus
embarrassed himself and members of his staff and probably lost some credibility
as well.” Pg 274. Not one mention of the numerous things said by Obama, Like
referring to American as having 57 states, or Obama calls Navy Corpsman (pr.
core-man) “corpse-man”, or On Memorial Day Obama said, “I see many of the
fallen heroes in the audience here today as we celebrate Memorial Day”. …. This
book should be banned from college shelves. This indoctrination is so obvious,
it hurts.
This chart Fig.8.3 in Chapter 8 …
This chart is very deceiving but the
author does not care. He purposely left out Obama’s part in this. Larson uses
it so young people unaware of how economics works in the country will be deceived.
This chart is to make a young mind believe that compared to the GOP, it is the
Democrats that look good, yet once again. The details missing are how Regan got
us out of a recession that Carter put us in. It takes years for any
economic development. I argue that Clinton was on the receiving end of the benefits and successes of Regan. When Clinton took office the economy was a good
recovery from Regan’s efforts and in 1996 when Clinton signed in NAFTA (North
American Free Trade Agreement) that is our first step to our economic downfall.
We were warned against such a policy by Ross Perot. People thought Ross was
crazy, but it turns out that he was dead on. Then during Clinton’s term in
office; Clinton signed in a policy that forced banks to give loans to people
who would not normally be able to get loan. This forced a lot of bad decisions
and loans to be given to people who could not pay them back. In 2008, the
housing bubble that was created bursts from this practice. Bush got all of the
blame for that; when in fact, Clinton is the one to blame. To make matters
worse, in 2003, Bush actually tried to get that reversed and failed. Bush tried
to get rid of the bad practices and warned of its affects. So now here we are
today, 19 Trillion in debt and barely being able to make the interest payments
on our loans thanks to Obama wanting the kick the can down the road. People
today still think we are on the upswing because that is what they are being
told via the mass media and the Liberals blinders of deception. You won’t see
the 19 trillion dollar debt on that chart, but you will hear how it was all
Bush’s fault; Even after 8 years of Obama promising to fix the economy. Total
denial on the liberal indoctrination machines part.
So based on all that I have proven
and all that I have shown you, do you believe that you are being indoctrinated.
This is just one text book, if you look at all of the text books from your
past, you will find the same thing. Do you believe that you have been on the
indoctrination path since childhood through the schools and media? Are you the
victim of Liberal Indoctrination? I was until I opened my eyes and searched out
the truth for myself. Ask yourself that question…..”Am I the victim of
Indoctrination?” Then once you allow your eyes to open, you can then search
your own path and tell the machine to kiss your open eyed butt. You will not
take it anymore.”
Good Luck and Blessings,
Matthew McKeon
Electrical Distribution Designer
Communication Major
References
Persuasion: Reception and
Responsibility
THIRTEENTH EDITION 2007
CHARLES U. LARSON
Northern Illinois University,
Emeritus
The Politico, LLC
volkalize, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVP4--PJKa0
DuckDuckGo.com
images.duckduckgo.com
